Pima County Sheriff caught with loaded gun at TSA checkpoint walked away without charges

Alex Tanzer,
 June 10, 2026

Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos brought a loaded, undeclared Glock handgun to a TSA checkpoint at Tucson International Airport in November 2024, and walked away without so much as a citation. Security and bodycam footage obtained by Fox News Digital through a public records request shows the entire encounter, from the Miranda warning to the officer's parting words: "You are free to go, good sir, have a wonderful vacation."

The sheriff missed his flight to Laguna Beach, California. He stowed the weapon in his vehicle, caught a later plane, and carried on with his trip. No arrest. No charges. No public accountability, until the video surfaced months later.

For ordinary travelers, the math works differently. Bringing a loaded firearm to an airport security checkpoint can trigger federal civil penalties, state criminal charges, or both. But Nanos, the top law-enforcement officer in Pima County, Arizona, received treatment that critics say no regular citizen would get. The episode lands at a moment when Nanos already faces a recall effort, an independent investigation into alleged misuse of his office, and sustained criticism over the still-unsolved disappearance of 84-year-old Nancy Guthrie.

What the video and incident report show

An incident report dated November 6, 2024, describes how a TSA X-ray technician spotted a weapon in Nanos' carry-on bag and flagged an officer. Airport police found five rounds in the magazine and another in the chamber, a fully loaded firearm headed through a checkpoint where millions of Americans are screened every year under strict federal rules.

In the footage, Nanos explains himself. He told the responding officer he had stayed at a hotel the night before, election night, and did not want to leave his department-issued gun in his valet-checked vehicle. So he stuffed it in his bag.

"Got up this morning in a rush, we were late, and just threw everything in."

The officer accepted the explanation, agreed it appeared to be an accident, informed superiors, and let Nanos go. The sheriff was read a Miranda warning but faced no further legal process. He simply walked back to his car, secured the weapon, and rebooked his flight.

TSA policy does allow active-duty law enforcement officers to fly armed, if they meet federal requirements and notify the airline in advance. Nanos apparently did neither. He showed up with an undeclared, loaded handgun in his carry-on like any other absent-minded traveler, except that an absent-minded traveler without a badge would likely face very different consequences.

A double standard in plain view

Cory Stephens, a Tucson-area resident and president of the Conservative Coalition of America, raised the issue at a Pima County Board of Supervisors public meeting on November 12, 2024, just six days after the incident. As the New York Post reported, Stephens told Fox News Digital the disparity was obvious:

"If a private citizen had encountered that at the airport, the consequences would have been greater."

Stephens did not stop there. He pointed out that Nanos, of all people, should have known better: "As a law enforcement officer, he should know the TSA rules, how to declare a weapon, secure it and follow the same rules as everyone else."

The Pima County Sheriff's Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the bodycam footage. The Pima County Attorney's Office declined to comment on the matter, citing ongoing litigation: "Thank you for your understanding, we will share updates when it becomes legally appropriate."

That wall of silence is itself telling. The county's top prosecutor will not say whether the sheriff's case was ever formally reviewed for charges, or why it was not.

Mounting trouble for Sheriff Nanos

The airport incident is not an isolated embarrassment. Nanos is facing a recall effort tied to his handling of the Nancy Guthrie disappearance, the case that has put Pima County law enforcement under a national spotlight.

Nancy Guthrie, the 84-year-old mother of "Today" co-host Savannah Guthrie, was the subject of a suspected abduction that remains unsolved. Photos released on February 10, 2026, showed an armed individual reaching toward a Google Nest camera at her front door in Tucson. A combined reward of more than $1.2 million has been offered for information that cracks the case, and the family continues to urge anyone with tips to call 1-800-CALL-FBI or Tucson's 88-Crime hotline at 1-520-882-7463.

Fox News reported that an independent investigation found the preponderance of evidence supported a finding that Nanos used his authority and department resources for political gain during his 2024 reelection race against former PCSD Lt. Heather Lappin. That finding layers on top of the TSA episode and the recall push to create a picture of a sheriff whose judgment and conduct are under sustained question.

The Pima County Board of Supervisors has unanimously demanded answers from Nanos over separate perjury allegations and a troubled work history, a bipartisan rebuke that underscores how far confidence in his leadership has eroded.

Cracking down, on YouTubers

While the sheriff avoided accountability for his own loaded-gun episode, his department has found the energy to crack down on a different kind of offender: online streamers who showed up in Nancy Guthrie's neighborhood.

Pima County deputies arrested or cited three YouTubers for allegedly creating a public nuisance near the Guthrie home. Alex Zabel, who streams under the name Criminal Network, and Troy Bradshaw, who goes by "DAA JUICE," were both briefly jailed on June 8. Damian Enderle, who runs the 857 Tucson channel, received a citation. All three face misdemeanor public nuisance charges; Zabel is also accused of obstructing the roadway.

A Pima County Sheriff's Department spokesperson said numerous complaints about blocked roadways, trespassing, and other neighborhood disruptions had been called in and that warnings went unheeded. The department's posture was forceful:

"Sheriff Nanos will no longer tolerate behavior that disrupts the community or violates the law."

The irony writes itself. A sheriff who carried a loaded, undeclared firearm through a federal security checkpoint without consequence now declares zero tolerance for YouTubers loitering on a public street.

Enderle pushed back on the arrests in a post on X, writing that "our lovely Sheriff Nanos has decided to go after YouTubers, streamers, and freelance journalists who dare enter the very street where Nancy Guthrie was kidnapped." He added: "Meanwhile, less than a mile south, in a county-patrolled area, it appears to be a homeless fentanyl free-for-all."

Pima County Supervisor Dr. Matt Heinz offered a more measured take but still raised questions about the enforcement posture: "Not sure those charges will stick, but it seems strange to still have people hanging around now that this has been a cold case for months. These neighbors deserve some peace."

A ban on media parking in the neighborhood has been in place since late February, after dozens of news vehicles camped out on the block for weeks following Savannah Guthrie's public account of the scene at her mother's home. The parking ban is one thing. Jailing content creators while the sheriff himself faces no legal consequences for a loaded gun at an airport checkpoint is another.

The accountability gap

The Pima County Attorney's Office will not talk. The sheriff's department will not comment on the bodycam. The responding officer wished Nanos a wonderful vacation. And the broader dispute over the Guthrie investigation, including FBI Director Kash Patel publicly faulting the sheriff's response, continues to simmer.

None of this means Nanos intended to smuggle a weapon onto a plane. His explanation, a rushed morning, a forgotten gun, is plausible enough on its face. Plenty of legal gun owners have made the same mistake. But "plenty of legal gun owners" do not run a county sheriff's department. They do not set enforcement priorities. They do not lecture the public about tolerating lawbreaking. And when they bring a loaded Glock to a TSA checkpoint, they usually face real consequences.

The question is not whether Nanos meant to break the rules. The question is whether the rules apply to him at all.

When a sheriff can carry a loaded gun through airport security and catch a later flight to the beach while his deputies jail YouTubers for standing on a sidewalk, the word for that is not law enforcement. It is privilege.

About Alex Tanzer

Get Real Conservative News:

Where you get your news matters. Make sure to sign up for the Conservative Journal Project
Sponsored